A good psychologist and a bad psychologist or what is an ideal therapy

Everyone who comes to therapy, regardless of its direction, the client's request, the individual therapist, certainly expects a positive results. Naturally, everyone expects the same  a therapist. And this is definitely a big plus for the process of therapy, which determines the expected result. It is important to pay attention to the  process of therapy. The classic version of the process is divided into three phases: diagnostic (finding the client's request, the identification of hidden motives, the choice of method of therapy, etc.) directly to therapy and the end of therapy. But do not forget that successful therapy can also consist of one meeting. Therefore, each client brings their individuality in the process of therapy and influence its outcome.

So what is the ideal therapy? What are the criteria? In any case, the criteria for ideal (or success) for the client and the therapist are often different. One client comes with a desire to give up his responsibility in the capable hands of the therapist for his own safety, ask for the pill of happiness or a solution to his problems, but "do not touch me", or build their own rules, familiar in the real world and etc. But in reality, the process of therapy is based on the relationship between two people (the client-therapist), where liability is 50x50; client is ready to work, rather, to explore the problem, despite the possibility of painful experiences, because therapy is not always easy and enjoyable pastime.

Since the therapist can also select multiple criteria for success (ideal) therapy. To end the therapy can, for example, when the therapist sees that the client may decide similar or new problem situations, or, by the way, if you can not help.

But the most important of all the criteria - is no 100% certainty that the therapy is successful when there is no unequivocal confidence in the therapy.